Out of your mind: Eliciting individual reasoning in one shot games
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper investigates the reasoning process in unprecedented strategic situations. It proposes a new experimental design that allows to obtain an incentivised, written account of individual reasoning. Those reveal that the reasoning of the large majority of participants is structured as conjectured by the level-k model. We estimate that around one third of the participants play non-strategically. Comparing individual reasoning within subject between two different games we find that the level of reasoning changes across strategic situation. The results support the concept of level reasoning while shedding doubt on the model’s potential predictive power. JEL Classification: C91, D83
منابع مشابه
Individual Characteristics vs. Experience: An Experimental Study on Cooperation in Prisoner's Dilemma
Cooperative behavior is often assumed to depend on individuals' characteristics, such as altruism and reasoning ability. Evidence is mixed about what the precise impact of these characteristics is, as the subjects of study are generally randomly paired, generating a heterogeneous mix of the two characteristics. In this study we ex-ante create four different groups of subjects by factoring their...
متن کاملEvidential Equilibria in Static Games: Heuristics and Biases in Strategic Interaction
Standard equilibrium concepts in game theory find it diffi cult to explain the empirical evidence for a large number of static games such as prisoner’s dilemma, voting, public goods, oligopoly, etc. Under uncertainty about what others will do in one-shot games of complete and incomplete information, evidence suggests that people often use evidential reasoning (ER), i.e., they assign diagnostic ...
متن کاملWho acts more like a game theorist? Group and individual play in a sequential market game and the effect of the time horizon
Previous experimental results on one-shot sequential two-player games show that group decisions are closer to the subgame-perfect Nash equilbirum than individual decisions. We extend the analysis of inter-group versus inter-individual decision making to a Stackelberg market game, by running both one-shot and repeated markets. Whereas in the one-shot markets we find no significant differences in...
متن کاملReasoning in Reference Games: Individual- vs. Population-Level Probabilistic Modeling
Recent advances in probabilistic pragmatics have achieved considerable success in modeling speakers' and listeners' pragmatic reasoning as probabilistic inference. However, these models are usually applied to population-level data, and so implicitly suggest a homogeneous population without individual differences. Here we investigate potential individual differences in Theory-of-Mind related dep...
متن کاملDo pre-performance routines have a role in free throws accuracy of basketball players?
A significant portion of research exploring pre-performance routines in sport has focused on the behavioral and temporal characteristics of the routines. This study aimed to investigate the role of behavioral and temporal consistency in those pre-performance routines. The duration and dominant behavioral patterns exhibited before each free throw (N = 1025) were observed during a total of 60 Ira...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Games and Economic Behavior
دوره 84 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014